The following projects are being run through my current position as a NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellow at the University of Oxford (a 3 year fellowship funded by the Natural Environment Research Council; 2016-2019).
Conservation science advice to mainstream biodiversity in the private sector (2016 – current)
NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellowship programme
Role: Academic lead
Summary: I work with representatives from governments, businesses, and NGOs to raise awareness of conservation science solutions to address business challenges with measuring, evaluating and reporting on corporate biodiversity performance. I provide targeted advice to multinational businesses such as BP, Kering and Sainsbury’s, and has been invited to contribute to a variety of business and biodiversity meetings, workshops, and conferences in the UK and internationally. I am also a member of the advisory board for the WCMC project developing biodiversity indicators for the extractives sector, and the Natural Capital Coalition Biodiversity Project Steering Group. Through these positions, I will provide expert conservation science advice to these internationally important projects. For more details on my Knowledge Exchange activities see the KE@ICCS current activities webpage.
Accounting for biodiversity: how to build biodiversity into corporate natural capital accounting and reporting (2018 – current) (2018 – current)
Workshop supported by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales Charitable Trusts, and the Natural Capital Coalition
Role: Academic co-lead, with Professor Richard Barker from the Saïd Business School
Summary: In July 2018, Prue Addison and Professor Richrd Barker convened a workshop to explore whether and how biodiversity can be integrated more comprehensively into corporate-level accounting and reporting. This workshop was kindly supported by the ICAEW’s Charitable Trusts and the Natural Capital Coalition, which helped bring together 17 participants with technical expertise across a variety of disciplines including accounting, sustainability, auditing, environmental economics, and conservation science. This topic is a complex one, which requires an in-depth understanding of the market forces that drive corporate accounting and reporting, the current status of non-financial accounting and reporting systems, an understanding of natural capital approaches to help value the living environment, and an understanding of biodiversity measurement and management. Participants engaged in enthusiastic and lively discussions around why accounting and reporting approaches are well defined in some areas (e.g. for finance and carbon), whilst other critical aspects of the natural environment, such as biodiversity, corporate accounting and reporting approaches are yet to be fully developed. A report from the workshop is now available (see link below). The next phase of this work will involve the production of a short briefing note on Accounting for Biodiversity for professional accountants, which will be produced in early 2019. Please contact Prue Addison for more information about this.
Workshop report: Addison, P.F.E, Barker, R. (2018) Biodiversity and corporate accounting and reporting workshop report. University of Oxford.
Analysis of international biodiversity targets to understand and maximise their relevance to the private sector (2017 – current)
Project collaborators: University of Oxford and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Funding: Valuing Nature Network
Role: Academic lead
Summary: I teamed up with Matt Smith (the JNCC) and a Valuing Nature Program intern, Tom Smith who is undertaking an analysis of international biodiversity targets (e.g. CBD Aichi Targets and Sustainable Development Goals) to illustrate their relevance to the private sector. The ultimate aim of this work is to help the international biodiversity goals become significantly more visible and relevant to everyday business activities. This report is aimed at businesses already undertaking actions for biodiversity, helping make the links between their actions and international policy clearer; and for businesses commencing their journey in exploring relevant actions that they could undertake to address their impacts and dependencies on nature and contribute to the international biodiversity goals.
The outputs from this work are informing strategic engagement of UK government, its agencies and Multi-lateral Environmental Agreements Secretariats with the private sector, and have directly feed into UK preparations for meetings such as business and biodiversity discussions at the Convention for Biological Diversity COP14 in 2018. It will also be used to inform the UK government’s mainstreaming biodiversity agenda, encouraging and enhancing private sector biodiversity action, and work towards the CDB Post-2020 Biodiversity Strategy.
Final Report: Smith, T., Addison, P. F. E., Smith, M. & Beagley, L. (2018) Mainstreaming international biodiversity goals for the private sector. Main Report & Case Studies, JNCC Report No. 613, JNCC, Peterborough, ISSN 0963-8091.
Technical Appendix: Mainstreaming biodiversity goals for the private sector
Practice note: Practice Note No. 6: Mainstreaming international biodiversity goals for the private sector
Clarifying the spectrum of biodiversity indicator applications for business (2017 – current)
Project collaborators: University of Oxford and the IUCN
Funding: In-kind collaboration between the University of Oxford (NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellowship programme) and the IUCN
Role: Academic lead
Summary: Many business leaders recognize the importance of accounting for their impacts and dependencies on biodiversity. Corporate biodiversity accountability approaches allow businesses to demonstrate their environmentally responsible actions and be accountable both internally (e.g., reporting to operations managers) and externally (e.g., reporting to investors, regulatory bodies, stakeholders, and the general public).
Measurement of biodiversity is a relatively new concept for many businesses, and many grapple with how to distil and act on information about complex and dynamic natural systems that interact with all levels of their business. They face critical challenges around developing indicators that can help effectively measure and evaluate biodiversity performance from site- to corporate- levels. The aim of this project is to create a framework and guidance to support businesses in identifying and/or developing robust and relevant biodiversity indicators for different corporate biodiversity accountability purposes. You can read more about the project here & here.
Final paper: Addison, P. F. E., Carbone, G., McCormick, N. (2018) The development and use of biodiversity indicators in business: an overview. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. vi + 16pp.
Webinar: The development and use of biodiversity indicators in business
Workshop report: Addison, P. F. E., Stephenson, P. J., Carbone, G., McCormick, N. (2018) Bridging the gap between science and business practice for biodiversity indicator development. Workshop Report. University of Oxford and IUCN.
A Collaborative Platform for Making Change: Scaling up actions for biodiversity conservation (2016 – current)
Project collaborators: University of Oxford, BP International, Fauna and Flora International, the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, and Defra.
Funding: In-kind collaboration between the University of Oxford (NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellowship programme), BP International, FFI, the UNEP-WCMC, the JNCC, and Defra
Summary: The Collaborative Platform for Making Change was established in August 2016. The Platform was convened to identify opportunities for collaboration between business, governments, science providers and NGOs, in support of the delivery of international biodiversity conservation priorities.
The initiative was launched prior to the 2016 World Conservation Congress, and focussed on discussing the IUCN motions relevant to the private sector. In 2016, the platform consisted of an event series, including a webinar, questionnaire and workshop bringing together representatives from 20 business and industry associations, 10 NGOs and intergovernmental organisation, and 3 research organisations.
In 2018, the platform reconvened prior to the 2018 Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties, and provided a forum for businesses to understand and promote business engagement in the development and future implementation of a post-2020 global biodiversity framework. The workshop brought together representatives from 25 UK-based businesses, along with 25 representatives of the UK government, NGOs and academia.
2018 Workshop Report and information document for the Convention on Biological Diversity COP: Engaging UK based business in the development of a post-2020 global biodiversity framework.
2016 Workshop Report: A Collaborative Platform for Making Change – Scaling up actions for biodiversity conservation
The future of corporate biodiversity accounting and disclosure. A live project run at the Conservation Optimism Summit, London (2017).
Project collaborators: The University of Oxford, Balfour Beatty, Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, Earthmind, Fauna & Flora International, IUCN Global Business and Biodiversity Programme, Kering, Luc Hoffmann Institute, Natural Capital Coalition, The B Team, University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute, Zoological Society of London.
Funding: Natural Environment Research Council
Role: Academic lead
Summary: In April 2017 the Conservation Optimism summit played host to a very special session in London, which brought together representatives from business, NGOs and universities to discuss the emerging field of business & biodiversity. Our session focused on biodiversity accounting (e.g., the development of biodiversity metrics for business) and disclosure (e.g., communicating biodiversity performance in corporate social responsibility reports).
This session brought together 12 amazing panel members to share the latest research and best practice examples of business’ involvement in biodiversity conservation. You can watch and share our three-part video series on the outcomes of the Business & Biodiversity session here:
Video Part 1: I provide a summary of the panel discussion on corporate biodiversity accounting and disclosure;
Video Part 2: We share highlights from the corporate biodiversity accounting and disclosure Q&A session;
Video Part 3: Five panel members’ take-home messages from the session. Featuring: Mark Gough, (Executive Director, Natural Capital Coalition), Giulia Carbone (Deputy Director, IUCN Global Business and Biodiversity Programme), Martina di Fonzo (Postdoctoral researcher, Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, and the University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute), Pippa Howard (Director of Business & Biodiversity, Fauna & Flora International) and Keith Tuffley (CEO of The B Team).
Towards an integrated monitoring program: identifying indicators and existing monitoring programs to cost-effectively evaluate the Long Term Sustainability Plan (2015-2016)
Project collaborators: Australian Institute of Marine Science and the Australian Department of the Environment
Role: Principal Investigator
Funding: National Environmental Science Program Tropical Water Quality Hub
Summary: This project addressed a series of critical initial steps required to develop a cost-effective integrated monitoring program. First, environmental, social and economic elements and indicators will be identified that could be monitored to enable an integrated evaluation of the Long Term Sustainability Plan (LTSP) targets. Second, existing monitoring programs will be evaluated against the newly developed LTSP targets, to ensure that the relevant aspects of these monitoring programs are considered for inclusion in an integrated monitoring program. Finally, the statistical performance of the AIMS Long Term and Marine Monitoring Programs will be evaluated to illustrate how these programs could cost-effectively contribute to an integrated monitoring program.
More details about this project can be found on the NESP Tropical Water Quality hub, and see our technical report:
Addison, P., Walshe, T., Sweatman, H., Jonker, M., Anthony, K., MacNeil, A., Thompson, A., Logan, M., 2015. Towards an integrated monitoring program: Identifying indicators and existing monitoring programs to effectively evaluate the Long Term Sustainability Plan, Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns, Australia.
A cost-effectiveness protocol to assist in the prioritisation of the second phase of Reef Trust investment (2014-2015)
Project collaborators: Australian Institute of Marine Science and the Australian Department of the Environment
Funding: Australian Department of the Environment
Summary: Dr Prue Addison and Dr Terry Walshe developed a modelling approach to estimate the cost-effectiveness of proposed management interventions in the Great Barrier Reef under the Reef Trust. The Reef Trust is an Australian Government initiative, where $140 million was been committed in 2015 to provide innovative, targeted investment focused on improving water quality, restoring coastal ecosystem health and enhancing species protection. You can read more about the Reef Trust and see our AIMS technical report on the approach to estimating cost-effectiveness of management interventions:
Addison, P. & Walshe, T. (2015) Summary report: the cost-effectiveness protocol used to assist in the prioritisation of the second phase of Reef Trust investment. Final Report to the Department of the Environment. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville.
A new wave of marine monitoring, evaluation and reporting. A special symposium held at the Australian Marine Sciences Association conference (2015)
Project collaborators: Australian Institute of Marine Science, Environment Protection Agency Victoria, Parks Victoria and the University of Plymouth
Funding: In kind support from the Australian Institute of Marine Science, Environment Protection Agency Victoria, Parks Victoria, and the University of Plymouth (NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellowship programme)
Role: Academic lead
Summary: Sustainable management and conservation of the world’s oceans requires effective monitoring, evaluation, and reporting (MER). Despite the growing political and social imperative for these activities, there are some persistent and emerging challenges that marine practitioners face in undertaking these activities.
A diverse group of marine MER practitioners from universities, government agencies, and consultancies, came together at the 2015 Australian Marine Sciences Association conference to discuss the emerging challenges and novel solutions for marine MER. This group of practitioners shared common ground in wanting to share experience and expertise to improve the management and protection of the marine environment. Our symposium focussed on identifying critical and emerging challenges facing today’s marine practitioners. We then explored solutions to these challenges and in doing so offer a vision for a new wave of marine MER within evidence-based management. The outcomes of our symposium are available in the following peer reviewed paper:
Addison, P. F. E., Collins, D.J., Trebilco, R., Howe, S., Bax, N., Hedge, P., Jones, G., Miloslavich, P., Roelfsema, C., Sams, M., Stuart-Smith, R.D., Scanes, P., von Baumgarten, P., McQuatters-Gollop, A. (2017) A new wave of marine evidence-based management: emerging challenges and solutions to transform monitoring, evaluating and reporting. ICES Journal of Marine Science. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsx216
Decision triggers for conservation management – understanding conservation management needs and exploring scientific approaches to developing decision triggers (2014-2015)
Project collaborators: University of Melbourne, Monash University, New Zealand Department of Conservation, and Parks Victoria (2014)
Funding: $7,000 from the National Environment Research Program
Summary: Managing natural environments involves difficult decisions about when to intervene in a system where undesirable trends have been identified. Intervening too early may result in unnecessary management actions, while intervening too late may lead to much more costly interventions or irreversible changes. There are many examples where for various reasons managers have failed to act on evidence of a population decline, resulting in the need for captive breeding programs or even extinction. Therefore, managers need to be able to identify the most appropriate point to act, a decision threshold, based on the best-available information.
Developing decision thresholds into a successful management tool requires an active dialogue between scientists and managers to ensure thresholds are firmly grounded in ecological theory and capture the realistic constraints on, and context for, management. While there is a growing interest in using decision thresholds, there is little or no coordination of efforts or information sharing between management agencies, and engagement with scientist about how to identify and define these thresholds is generally ad hoc. To remedy this, researchers at the University of Melbourne and Monash University ran a NERP funded workshop with protected area managers to discuss the development of decision thresholds that could guide when to intervene in an ecosystem. The outcomes of this project are now available through 3 peer-reviewed papers:
Cook, C.N., de Bie, K., Keith, D.A. & Addison, P.F.E. (2016) Decision triggers are a critical part of evidence-based conservation. Biological Conservation, 195, 46–51.
Addison, P.F.E., Cook, C.N., de Bie, K. (2016) Conservation practitioners’ perspectives on decision triggers for evidence-based management. Journal of Applied Ecology. 53:1351–1357.
de Bie, K, Addison, P.F.E., Cook, C.N. (2017) Integrating decision triggers into conservation management practice. Journal of Applied Ecology. DOI:10.1111/1365-2664.1304
PhD research: “Targeting the science–management interface: Improving the use of long-term monitoring for conservation management” (2011 – 2014)
Project collaborators: University of Melbourne, Monash University and Parks Victoria
Funding: Australian Postgraduate Award, plus funding from Parks Victoria and the NERP Marine Biodiversity Research Hub
Role: PhD research candidate
Summary: Long-term biological monitoring data are becoming increasingly available to inform conservation efforts internationally. These data are rich sources of scientific evidence that offer insights into the natural variability of ecosystems and species through time, as well revealing information about the effectiveness of conservation efforts. However, there are many occasions where long-term monitoring data, like other forms of scientific evidence, have been of little use to conservation. Scientists have been criticised for failing to collecting long-term monitoring data that is relevant to conservation management, and on the other hand conservation managers have been criticised for not using available scientific data to inform their management decisions.
Through my PhD research I explored barriers to the use of long-term monitoring data in conservation management, and developed a series of practical solutions to improve the use of scientific evidence in conservation management. My research targeted the science–management interface, acknowledging that both scientists and managers play vital roles in the creation and use of scientific evidence in conservation management. Marine protected area (MPA) management was the focus of my research, as there are now many long-term monitoring programs associated with MPAs around the globe available to inform MPA management.
To investigate how long-term monitoring data are currently informing conservation management, I conducted interviews with MPA managers and scientists from Australian management agencies. I was particularly interested in documenting a national perspective of how long-term biological monitoring data are used to inform the evaluation and evidence-based management of MPAs. My research revealed that long-term monitoring data are rarely used quantitatively to inform condition assessments in management effectiveness evaluation (MEE). Despite this I found substantial evidence that long-term monitoring data are informing the evidence-based management of MPAs – contrary to the common criticism that conservation management agencies fail to use scientific evidence to inform management. This research revealed that the mechanism for the knowledge transfer from monitoring to evidence-based management is not MEE, indicating continued challenges for the practice of MEE in “closing the loop” to facilitate evidence-based management.
I asked the managers and scientists what would need to change in order to make quantitative condition assessment a reality for MEE, to help ensure that MEE facilitates evidence-based management. Their responses provided a rich commentary on the current state of MPA management, pointing to a complex array of operational, scientific and socio-political challenges. The greatest challenges that managers and scientists face include: a lack of agency capacity dedicated to monitoring and evaluation of biological indicators; the need for decision-support tools to be developed to help translate scientific evidence into management action; and, a lack of political and community support for, and understanding of protected areas.
To address some of the scientific barriers identified by MPA practitioners, I developed two methodological approaches to improve the use of long-term monitoring data in evidence-based management. These approaches focus on the development of conservation management thresholds to assist with interpreting long-term monitoring data and alert when management intervention is required to address undesirable ecosystem changes. The first approach uses the theory of control charts to set statistically informed management thresholds for environmental indicators. The second is a participatory modelling approach, designed to be useful when management thresholds must be set for multi-objective conservation problems by participants with limited modelling experience. Both approaches follow the steps of structured decision-making, emphasising the need for logical and transparent model development in conservation.
My PhD research advances the understanding of the barriers to using scientific evidence in conservation management. Many factors are at play that transcend the science–management interface. The practical solutions developed in my PhD substantively address many important barriers and promote the comprehensive use of scientific evidence in conservation management.
My PhD thesis is accessible through Minerva Access.
Publications from my PhD:
Addison P.F.E., Flander L.B., Cook C.N. (2017) Towards quantitative condition assessment of biodiversity outcomes: insights from Australian marine protected areas. Journal of Environmental Management. 198, 183–191.
Addison, P.F.E., Flander, L. B., Cook, C.N. (2015) Are we missing the boat? Current uses of long-term biological monitoring data in the evaluation and management of marine protected areas. Journal of Environmental Management. 149, 148–156.
Addison, P.F.E, de Bie, K., Rumpff, L. (2015) Setting conservation management thresholds using a novel participatory modelling approach. Conservation Biology, 29, 1411–1422.
Addison, P. F. E., Rumpff, L., Bau, S. S., Carey, J. M., Chee, Y. E., Jarrad, F., McBride, M. F., and Burgman, M. A. (2013). Practical solutions for making models indispensable in conservation decision-making. Diversity and Distributions. Special issue on: Perspectives and tools for conservation risk analysis. 19, 490–502.
Burgman, M., Lowell, K., Woodgate, P., Jones, S., Richards, G., Addison, P. (2012). An endpoint hierarchy and process control charts for ecological monitoring, in: Lindenmayer, D.B., Gibbons, P. (Eds.), Biodiversity monitoring in Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 71-78.
Quality Assurance of the UK’s Marine Biological Monitoring Programmes (2008-2010)
Project collaborators: The UK Environment Agency and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Role: Technical Specialist (Marine Scientist)
Summary: Prue Addison was responsible for developing quality assurance protocols for national marine monitoring programs across the UK; management and analysis of national environmental datasets; website design & maintenance; facilitating national workshops; and, delivering science presentations.
Monitoring and Assessment of Victoria’s Rocky Intertidal Coast (MAVRIC; 2005-2007)
Project collaborators: Museum Victoria and the University of Melbourne
Funding: National Heritage Trust
Role: Project Officer (Marine Ecologist)
Summary: Victoria’s rocky intertidal reefs support a diverse array of animals and plants, many of which are unique to south eastern Australia. These reefs are exposed at low tide and as a result they are subject to human induced pressures such as trampling by visitors, over-harvesting of some shellfish, poor water quality and coastal development. There was limited understanding of howhuman induced pressures affect the inhabitants of Victoria’s rocky intertidal reefs. This project sought to develop an in depth understanding of human impacts on Victoria’s rocky intertidal reefs. The outcomes of this project are now available through 2 peer-reviewed papers:
O’Hara T. D., Addison, P. F. E., Gazzard, R., Costa, T. L., Pocklington, J. B. (2010). A rapid biodiversity assessment methodology tested on intertidal rocky shores. Aquatic Conservation – Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 20(4), 452-463.
Addison, P. F. E., Koss, R. S. and O’Hara, T. D. (2008). Recreational use of a rocky intertidal reef in Victoria: Implications for ecological research and management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 15, 169-179.